The proposed benefits
Annette Salles is a postdoctoral research assistant at Northumbria University in Newcastle, UK. As part of her PhD at Queen’s University in Belfast, she analysed ice thickness and temperature observations and co-produced Indigenous knowledge with a Manitoba First Nation to project the future of winter roads, an essential lifeline for many remote communities in the province.
Alongside researchers at the University of Manitoba and others, Salles has also looked at the viability of a large-scale northern corridor that “would involve the construction of roads, railways, transmission lines, northern ocean ports and pipelines to enable the local extraction of natural resources and their regional and global transport.” (While there is no one proposed route for the notional corridor, the idea would be for it to reach across both northern and southern parts of the country, including in the Yukon and NWT, and connect all three coasts.)
The important lesson to be learnt in proposals for economic corridors, Salles says, is the economic development promised through them may “not do much” for socio-economic factors in the communities that live along them, particularly northern and Indigenous ones.
Like the Mackenzie Valley Highway, the northern corridor was initially suggested as a means of supporting resource development for remote Indigenous communities and reducing the cost of living in them. Yet the research Salles was involved in found that instead of providing such long-term benefits, road networks may bring a ‘resource curse’ to Indigenous communities, wherein they experience mainly negative economic and social impacts in the long run.
According to the team, this resource curse is apparent across Canada already, including at Norman Wells, which the Mackenzie Valley Highway is supposed to connect to Tulita, and at Shoal Lake 40 in Ontario, “where oil and water pipelines have resulted in negative environmental, health and socio-cultural impacts without providing permanent road access or long-term jobs, and without reducing high food prices.”
Salles says these communities have been experiencing the brunt of “the pollution, the water resources that are being taken from or diverted, dam building for energy projects … communities don’t benefit but have to endure all the disadvantages and all the problems in the end.”
In the case of the Mackenzie Valley Highway, Salles also says it’s important to look at the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk highway and the real benefits it has brought to both communities. Case studies suggest the highway did not improve the price of groceries and the cost of living in Tuktoyaktuk because it did not address other factors such as the cost of transportation and the cost of storage.
“If you still only have one store or one organization providing the stores [in that community], then you’re not getting away from this monopoly structure and you’re not going to lower food prices,” Salles says, adding that the impact on employment and tourism will also likely be limited because the distance between communities continues to be too far to travel regularly.
“Employment can only come from either mobility — if you can go someplace else to actually find a job — or from incoming economic opportunities, and that again will have some challenges.”
Through existing road networks, Salles’ research team found that corridors can in fact worsen food insecurity and promote “the unsustainable use of resources to fuel the global economy, supercharged by late-stage capitalism and colonialism’s legacy of racism.” The benefits also rarely materialize for Indigenous communities in particular as such infrastructure development is not often supported with other changes and funding for communities.
“It’s finding that balance,” Salles reflects. “If you don’t have enough economic impacts on the positive side, why should you have to deal with all the challenges and with all the problems that [a road] brings with it?”