The western world’s growth imperative is the wrong playbook. In 1972, The Limits to Growth used early computer models to show if worldwide economic growth continued without regard for environmental costs, “we would reach and then overshoot the carrying capacity of the Earth at some point in the next one hundred years.” As predicted, we are starting to see those cracks with rising levels of poverty, pollution, water scarcity, food insecurity, forced displacement… the list goes on.
My life feels out of alignment because the systems supporting my life are misaligned. I isolate myself from social functions because the “not talking about it” feels like a betrayal to the urgent, COVID-level-degree of international crisis management I think we all should be lobbying for and coordinating.
Keep in mind, I’m doing none of that. From my deflated vantage point on the couch, weighted by a heaviness that feels like Mother Nature and all the innocents caught in armed crossfires everywhere are bearing down on my chest, I worry something is very wrong with me.
According to some experts, I’m having a reasonable emotional reaction in sync with the suffering planet of which we’re all a part. Eco-anxiety, ecological grief, eco-distress and climate anxiety are all largely interchangeable shorthand for the “challenging feelings” people have once they awaken to the planetary health crisis, writes Britt Wray in Generation Dread: Finding Purpose in an Age of Climate Crisis. More commonly, she says, these feelings are just called “fear, terror, anxiety, depression, despair, overwhelm, stress, worry, sadness, rage, grief, guilt, heartbreak, dread.”
Wray suggests eco-anxiety is “merely a sign of attachment to the world.” A moral emotion. Not an illness. Environmental philosopher Glenn Albrecht calls this emotional attachment to “perceived or felt states of the Earth” psychoterratic.