People & Culture

Excerpt from Travels Up the Creek: A Biologist’s Search for a Paddle

Biologist Lorne Fitch engages readers in a collection of essays reshaping perspectives on environmental stewardship toward a sustainable future

  • Nov 11, 2024
  • 1,204 words
  • 5 minutes
Expand Image
Advertisement
Advertisement

Excerpted from Travels Up the Creek: A Biologist’s Search for a Paddle by Lorne Fitch. Copyright ©2024 Lorne Fitch and Rocky Mountain Books. Published by Rocky Mountain books. Reproduced by arrangement with the Publisher. All rights reserved.

If rivers were sentient beings with the faculty of communication they might ask some difficult questions. Why do we give them such confusing and contradictory advice? Why are they blamed for our mismanagement? If they provide us with the essential ingredient for life and livelihoods—water—why is that value and service so unappreciated? Don’t we realize that rivers go far beyond just providing for our economic possibilities? How can we be so blind to the needs of rivers?

Illustration: Liz Saunders
Expand Image

We ask them to slow down, with dams; speed up with channelization and riprap walls; go here, not there; and stay away from where we have built but be close enough to be useful. There might be wry comments about muddying their waters, polluting it, sucking vast quantities away and disrupting the natural rhythms of annual flow, even as we rely on their life-giving flows. It’s a head-scratcher.

Rivers might be incredulous that we would blame them for floods, especially the extreme, repetitive ones. Rivers might rightfully argue they don’t cause floods— they merely provide the conduit for flood waters. Flood waters that are, in part, exacerbated and accentuated by logging clearcuts, a lattice-work of roads and, sometimes our flood control measures. The raging flow, spilling out, consuming bridges, fields, houses and stately cottonwoods as the river gags on water that could have been absorbed for a later slow, sedate release. Blaming the river is like blaming the hammer that you used to hit your own finger.

We remove large volumes of water, often when rivers need those flows most to revitalize their beds and banks. It seems like multiple abuse, blame for flooding, then throttling back on flow later, to starve the river. In a poor bargain, then replacing these essential flows with a dribble of often polluted return water. 

Illustration: Liz Saunders
Expand Image

Rivers might shake their heads at the inconsistency of wanting them to be at our beck and call, upstream and down, and always provide flows of sufficient quantity and quality when we indiscriminately divert, pollute and ignore seasonal rhythms. Rivers might ask why we don’t apply the golden rule of treating our downstream neighbours as we would want our upstream neighbours to treat us.

Rivers used to define us. They were often the easy ways of moving through the landscape. Their tree-shrouded valleys were shelter from summer heat and winter storm. We quenched our thirst and ate from the cornucopia of fish, wildlife and wild fruit. Rivers might wonder why we have turned our backs on them. Aren’t they still important?

There was a time we respected, maybe even loved our rivers. Now, we take rivers for granted, making them our back alleys and drains instead of our front yards. It has become too easy to ignore and abuse them. 

Rivers might be concerned that something ignored too long becomes something forgotten. Once we lose a vision of what a river in its natural state looks like, we slip into believing the concrete or riprap-lined trickle of stained, discoloured water is a river as it always has been. It’s then hard to have an affinity for something that you must wade through waste to get to, don’t want to touch (or drink) and certainly a place you don’t want to linger.

Illustration: Liz Saunders
Expand Image

We can begin, again, to respect and honour our rivers. There are indicators that can tell us if a river is healthy or, if missing, inspire us to consider some restoration. Rivers appreciate flows that have natural variability since variation in flows is critical to the ecosystem that a river supports. 

Spring floods are essential to reset the ecological clock, providing new sediment bars for the seeds of cottonwood trees to establish. Substrates of gravel are cleansed of sediment and new pools are created, mandatory for aquatic life. Our engineering works strive to even out flows and provide the illusion of flood protection, contrary to what the river needs. If asked, a river would prefer not to be a canal, or a ditch. 

A river without water, or even much water ceases to be a river, so a river would appreciate it if an adequate and appropriate amount of water always flows down its channel. There are ecological imperatives and thresholds for the right amount of water. Suitable flows maintain the structure of a river channel—its pools where fish escape the ever-present current and riffles where the agitation of the water over cobble and boulders entrains air, allowing the aquatic community to breathe. When these flows occur, the wastes we flush into the river are assimilated and cleansed, much to the relief of downstream users.

Illustration: Liz Saunders
Expand Image

The riparian zone, the green profusion of trees, shrubs, flowering plants and grasses needs river flows to water and allow regeneration of plant life. The result is a cacophony of bird song, abundant other wildlife and a pleasant cool space for us to escape a summer sun. These are the places where we might hear the questions rivers pose. Riverside riparian zones are a place to retreat to, to recreate in and to be inspired by nature. The deep, binding roots of many riparian plants resist the gnawing action of flow, creating a détente of sorts with erosion. If you want a stable river bank, strap it to a tree with deep roots.

Often unseen and so underappreciated, except by anglers, are the fish species that are native to and have, over millennia, adapted to the nuances of the river. Their presence, abundance, diversity and distribution are key indicators of how well we have cared for a river and its watershed. Fish and other aquatic life are the ultimate arbiter and report card on river health. A grade of “F” needs to be avoided, and even a “D” or a “C” aren’t good enough.

Health speaks to ecosystem pieces and ecological processes present and functioning in accord with natural variation. There is also resiliency, the ability to bounce back, to rebound from random sucker punches of the natural world, one made more chaotic by our actions. A river might point out that if it is healthy, there is a good chance we who depend on it are as well.

A river whispers at the edge of human lives, touching us with its presence and its passing. It both stays and moves on, inquiring as it goes. To that inquiry we need to listen and respond. In answer to a river’s questions, we should reply, “We need a much better understanding of you.” In saying that, maybe we can aspire to treat you better. 

Realistically, rivers can’t communicate with us and it is, of course, inappropriate to ascribe to them human-like qualities, like the ability to ask questions. As a biologist who thinks rivers should command greater respect, I risk my professional credibility to suggest rivers speak. But someone should ask these questions on behalf of rivers, since they can’t. It would honour the rivers that give us so much if we had the appropriate answers.

Advertisement

Help us tell Canada’s story

You can support Canadian Geographic in 3 ways:

Related Content

Peel River Expedition 2019 aerial view of Wind River

Exploration

Expedition log: Back to the Peel

David McGuffin shares insights from his daily log during his summer 2018 expedition retracing a legendary trek on the Yukon’s Peel River

  • 2347 words
  • 10 minutes

Exploration

River guide

I recently had the opportunity to interview Michelle Swallow, author of the Mackenzie River Paddling Guide. A fortuitous meeting at the Yellowknife airport this past…

  • 1164 words
  • 5 minutes
Photo courtesy the Canadian Canoe Museum

History

Canoe love

Canadian Canoe Museum explores the link between paddling and romance

  • 1530 words
  • 7 minutes

People & Culture

Photos: Young family paddles from Edmonton to new home in Montreal

The goal was simply to get home. Except, there was nothing simple about it.

  • 608 words
  • 3 minutes
Advertisement
Advertisement