This article is over 5 years old and may contain outdated information.

Science & Tech

A look at the complexities of reaping the rewards of Arctic resource development

  • Jan 24, 2014
  • 374 words
  • 2 minutes
Expand Image
Advertisement

Like much of Canada’s Arctic, Quebec’s Nunavik region boasts vast energy and mineral reserves. Inuit there are increasingly accessing the potential benefits from their development by negotiating agreements with companies whose projects bring guarantees of employment and local business development opportunities.

It’s tempting to assume that this will bring an end to poverty in these communities, but although poverty in the North is decreasing as a whole, the reality is more complex.

According to Laval University sociologist Gérard Duhaime, who has worked with Aboriginal Peoples in Nunavik for more than 30 years developing accurate measures of living conditions (most recently as Canada Research Chair on Comparative Aboriginal Condition), the benefits of resource extraction flow to communities nearest a mine, but are not being reflected equally by all communities, or even by all members of a single community.

“If a mine decides to negotiate only with the very closest village, rather than all the villages in a region, you end up with economic disparity,” he says. Likewise, when it comes to employment, “it increases the potential for certain households to consume more and have a better life.” But those who can’t work because they lack the education or skills, or are not interested in the specific opportunities, benefit less.

This, Duhaime says, can strain the social fabric. “You have an increase in social stratification. Instead of seeing yourself as a group, you begin to see yourself as different classes of people competing for the same resources.”

Fortunately, Duhaime sees a new generation of Inuit leaders who are working to address these challenges — in part by negotiating more equitable and inclusive agreements with resource development companies.

“I’m quite optimistic,” says the professor. “The younger generation have this ideology that if there is going to be change for the better, it must come from the people themselves, from their energy and involvement. Clearly, they’re heading in the right direction.”

This is the latest in a continuing blog series on polar issues and research presented by Canadian Geographic in partnership with the Canadian Polar Commission. The polar blog will appear online every two weeks, and select blog posts will be featured in upcoming issues. For more information on the Canadian Polar Commission, visit polarcom.gc.ca.
Expand Image
Expand Image
Advertisement

Are you passionate about Canadian geography?

You can support Canadian Geographic in 3 ways:

Related Content

People & Culture

On thin ice: Who “owns” the Arctic?

As the climate heats up, so do talks over land ownership in the Arctic. What does Canadian Arctic Sovereignty look like as the ice melts?

  • 4353 words
  • 18 minutes
Arctic Frontiers conference 2019

Environment

Five key takeaways from the Arctic Frontiers conference

The uncertainty and change that's currently disrupting the region dominated the annual meeting's agenda

  • 2651 words
  • 11 minutes

People & Culture

Q&A with Jeff Westeinde on Ottawa’s Zibi project

In the April issue of Canadian Geographic I wrote about Stratford, Ont.'s three decade struggle to repurpose the giant, neglected railway…

  • 5118 words
  • 21 minutes
Adam Lajeunesse at Ulukhaktok, N.W.T.

People & Culture

Q&A: Arctic policy expert Adam Lajeunesse on the future of Canada’s north

How Donald Trump, Russian icebreakers and a warming climate might affect the top of the world

  • 803 words
  • 4 minutes