“I haven’t performed in a long time. I’ve really paused music,” she says with a discernable note of regret. “This sector is not a nine to five. You take home a lot of work.”
From two different vantage points, Elwan and Wilks have witnessed and reshaped the Canadian immigration story — as immigrants themselves and as supporters of newcomers. Their experiences reveal what immigration and refugee settlement in Canada looks like in the 21st century. For much of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, immigration to Canada was about colonizing the continent with (mostly) people of European descent. Policy shifts in the 1960s favoured skills and education and eliminated racial preference in ways that enshrined the economic benefits of immigration as a source of GDP growth, a solution to labour shortages and a pipeline to Canada’s emerging multicultural national identity. The economic case for immigration is clear, but so are the cracks in the system. Now, in this mixed narrative, women take the lead supporting other women, and newcomers of different generations and backgrounds fill in gaps in government cutbacks or policy flip-flopping on the number of immigrants admitted to Canada.
Migrants to this country have built networks of support to help weather changing attitudes to immigration. In 2024, 58 per cent of Canadians believed the country accepts too many immigrants, up 14 per cent from the previous year, which saw a jump of 17 per cent from the one before (2022). Although the majority of Canadians (68 per cent) still view immigration as a net positive to the economy, some commentators and settlement workers, including Wilks, believe the system is at a breaking point, being kept together by the goodwill and sacrifices of other immigrants who are farther along their journey into Canada.